The
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mr. Aminu Tambuwal, said on
Tuesday that available records indicated that the Federal Government
spent over N1tn on kerosene subsidy between 2010 and 2013.
Tambuwal said in spite of the
expenditure not having the approval of the National Assembly, the
product was not available for “suffering Nigerians” to buy.
He also noted that the product was not sold in any part of the country at the subsidised price of N50 per litre.
Tambuwal spoke in Abuja as the House
Committee on Petroleum Resources (Downstream) opened an investigation
into subsidy payments on kerosene between 2010 and 2013.
The committee, which is headed by Mr.
Dakuku Peterside, has the mandate to establish the actual amount spent
on subsidy by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, the sole
supplier of the product, and how it got the authority to subsidise it.
The Speaker, who was represented by his
Deputy, Mr. Emeka Ihedioha, said, “Curiously, since there were no
budgetary provisions for subsidy on kerosene, the people of Nigeria will
obviously be interested in knowing the source of funding of kerosene
subsidy and on whose authority such money was appropriated.”
But, the Group Managing Director of the
NNPC, Mr. Andrew Yakubu, and the Managing Director of the Pipelines and
Products Marketing Company, Mr. Haruna Momoh, evaded questions on the
actual amount of money spent on subsidy during the years under review.
Yakubu at first declined to make the
presentation of the NNPC, yielding the floor to Momoh to address the
committee on kerosene importation and distribution.
Although he told the committee that he
would adopt the presentation of Momoh, lawmakers insisted that he must
answer questions on policy issues after the PPMC-MD would have concluded
his submissions.
Momoh gave the figures of kerosene
supplied in the respective years as follows: 2010 (2.5 trillion metric
tones); 2011 (1.9 trillion metric tonnes); 2012 (2.6 trillion metric
tonnes); and 2013 (2.6 trillion metric tonnes).
He explained that the figures represented both the imported product and the quantity supplied by local refineries.
Specifically, Momoh gave the imported
figures as 1.7 trillion metric tonnes (2010); 1.6 trillion metric tonnes
(2011); 1.8 trillion metric tonnes (2012); and 2.1 trillion metric
tonnes (2013).
He told the committee that the job of
the agency ended with the bulk supply of the product, adding that it was
not answerable for how it reached the end-users.
Momoh said this leg of the distribution
chain was the responsibility of “regulatory agencies,” which must
liaise with law enforcement agencies to “ensure seamless distribution of
kerosene.”
“The PPMC does not own a single filling station in the country,” he told the committee.
However, he offered explanations on why
the product was scarce in spite of the huge statistics on supplies and
why there were challenges in distribution.
Momoh claimed that substantial quantity
of kerosene was diverted to neighbouring countries to be sold at higher
prices because Nigeria subsidised the supply.
He also said that kerosene is used for road projects in the construction industry.
Momoh added that other factors like the
use of kerosene as aviation fuel and the activities of vandals, who
frequently destroyed pipelines, compounded the distribution challenges.
Momoh observed that there was over-
reliance on kerosene for domestic purposes and therefore urged
Nigerians to consider liquefied natural gas as a cheaper alternative
that could force down the price of kerosene.
When asked to disclose the actual
subsidy spent on kerosene in the four years under review, Momoh
redirected the question to the GMD.
“It is the GMD that will answer that
question because the PPMC is only an arm of the NNPC doing the field
work. We don’t have information on budgetary approvals,” he said.
When the committee put the question on
actual subsidy spending to the NNPC GMD, he claimed that the corporation
had yet to compute the figures for the four years.
He said, “We have not computed the
numbers on the budget and subsidy on kerosene. We have the numbers, but
I will say that we don’t have the exact numbers here. I will go back to
my documentation and relevant departments to come back again.”
Yakubu insisted that the subsidy on
kerosene was never removed, but he consistently parried questions on how
the NNPC got the authority to subsidise the product.
PUNCH NG
No comments:
Post a Comment