The
All Progressives Congress on Tuesday dared the Independent National
Electoral Commission, saying it would not change its name as suggested
by the electoral umpire.
The yet-to-be registered party also said
there was no iota of truth in the claim by INEC that a group with the
same acronym had approached it for registration as a political party.
The Chief Press Secretary to the commission’s Chairman, Mr. Kayode Idowu, was reported by a national daily (not The PUNCH)
to have urged opposition parties in the APC to consider a new name and
abbreviation to facilitate the registration of their group as a
political party.
“We don’t encourage political parties
with similar names, manifestoes, logos and acronyms and this is aimed at
avoiding confusion between registered political parties with similar
names and acronyms,” the newspaper quoted Idowu to have said.
But some leaders of the opposition political parties that merged to form the APC said INEC must be lying about its claim.
They said the APC , which came into
being as a result of the merger of three opposition political parties,
would not change its identity.
The leaders were asked to comment on
the speculations that other leaders of the APC were already
considering to change the name to ADC.
Speaking with one of our correspondents,
the National Publicity Secretary of the Action Congress of Nigeria,
Alhaji Lai Mohammed, said the APC would not change its name.
He said, “No, we won’t change our name. We will stand by that name and that is what we want to be called at the commission.”
The Congress for Progressive Change spokesman, Mr. Rotimi Fashakin, said he agreed with Mohammed.
Fashakin said, “ We shall show to the
Nigerian people nay, the whole world that INEC is indeed in collusion
with the ruling party, the PDP, to extirpate any vestige of
constitutional democracy from Nigeria’s political space.”
He stated that the subterranean move by the PDP to scuttle the merger had boomeranged.
“They are unaware that their plot to
surreptitiously lay this subterfuge as an impediment for the emergence
of the new mega party would be unravelled at such an early stage,” the
CPC spokesman added.
He then asked, “Did INEC intend to use
this terse letter from a law firm as a reason for refusing the
registration of the new mega opposition party even when requirements for
registration have not been satisfied by this ‘African People’s
Congress’ and its phony sponsors? Is there any collusion with INEC
leadership in this secret plot?
“Did the Electoral Act contemplate a
letter from a law firm as the condition precedent for the registration
of a political party or such as enshrined in section 222 (a – e) of the
2010 constitution (as amended)?’
Also, a former Governorship candidate
for the CPC in Enugu State, Chief Osita Okechuwku, insisted that the
APC would not succumb to the pressure to change its identity.
He said, “We challenge INEC to resist
the temptation of registration of mischief-makers and confusionists
represented by a lawyer. The intendment of the constitution and the
Electoral Act is that mischief-makers shall not be registered as
political party. INEC can’t claim to be ignorant of the birth of APC on
February 6. I can tell you that we won’t change our name as presently
known.”
Okechukwu added that the merging
parties had announced the formation of APC on February 6 through the
media before the African Peoples Congress went to INEC.
THE PUNCH
No comments:
Post a Comment