Writer
and poet, Odia Ofeimun, has rated the late Premier of the old Western
Region, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, above late former South African
President, Nelson Mandela.
The social critic, in an interview granted to Sahara TV which was uploaded to YouTube
and seen by our correspondent, said although “Mandela was good for the
liberation” of his people, Awolowo made far-reaching impacts on the
lives of many Nigerians.
Ofeimun, while comparing the two
leaders, said the processes leading to independence in South Africa and
Nigeria “followed exactly the same pattern” noting that the liberation
struggle championed by Mandela did “not create the end of apartheid.”
He said Awolowo negotiated Nigeria’s
independence just as Mandela did, adding that it would amount to a
“hype” to think that there were differences in what the two leaders
essentially fought for in their respective countries to end
colonisation.
Ofeimun said, “I am too much of an
Awolowo man not to see that the process of moving into independence in
South Africa and in Nigeria followed exactly the same pattern. It was
based on a negotiated settlement. The liberation struggle did not create
the end of apartheid. It was a negotiation and Nigerians negotiated
exactly the way Mandela negotiated.
“You can hype it if you like, but the
pattern was exactly the same. You move from one meeting to the other,
discussing politics and economics, and they successfully convinced
Mandela to buy the pig in a poke of an economy and they also successfully succeeded in convincing Nigerians to buy the pig in a poke of an economy.
“The only man in Nigeria, who stood up
against it, was (Obafemi) Awolowo. He was quickly jailed and all his men
scattered across the prisons in Nigeria. Some driven abroad and the
educational system that he had put in place was smashed.”
While choosing Awolowo above the late
anti-apartheid leader, Ofeimun said the philosophical postulations about
the workings of a state put forward by Awolowo were superior to those
credited to Mandela.
Insisting that Mandela could not match
the stature of Awolowo, the Edo State-born poet said Ghana’s first
President Kwame Nkrumah was the only African leader that could be seen
to rival Awolowo.
But according to him, Nkrumah’s ideology
of pan-Africanism lacked the capacity to “save Africa’’ when compared
to Awolowo’s brand of socialism.
He said, “People talk about Mandela’s
capacity to put various classes (of people) together as theory, but
Awolowo ironed it out very clearly, why you don’t need a class struggle,
in order to create a society in which all children can go to school; in
which everybody can get a job, and in which old age pensions will be
paid to people.
“It is not just love and I want to
emphasise that. Those who criticise Awolowo’s socialism for wanting in
love are obviously basing their argument on his claim that a government
should be like a sun that shines on all equally. If it is about a theory
of how to bring the people together on the African continent, none is
as good as the Awolowo’s and I’m not trying to pretend.
“Bring all their writings, fine phrases,
alright, but reduce them to economic terms, and I can tell you that
there is only one man who rivals Awolowo in this respect and that is
Nkrumah. Unfortunately unlike Awolowo, Nkrumah did not believe in either
a democratic or a federal theory. If you want to save Africa, you need
those two.”
Asked by the interviewer why he chose
Awolowo over Mandela, Ofeimun said “Yes and I will tell you why, the
simple reason is that what needed to be done in South Africa, after
apartheid was precisely what Awolowo wanted for Western Region and
Nigeria after independence. Which is to say put every child at school,
ensure that productivity takes the creativity of the individual citizen
into proper focus and build the relationship between people and not on
whether they did not love each other? But whether there is justice and
equality.”
PUNCH NG
No comments:
Post a Comment