THE influential New York Times, perhaps, has picked
Nigeria’s Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala over US President Barack Obama’s nominee
for the World Bank presidency, Jim Yong Kim.
Comentators on the paper said: “Whereas Okonjo-Iweala has already
attracted strong endorsements from publications at the cutting edge of
global financial journalism like The Economist, and The Financial Times, this new endorsement enhances the profile of Okonjo Iweala.
Conventional qualities
The New York Times is unequivocal in its support saying as
an “economist, diplomat and former World Bank managing director, she
offers many conventional qualities of bank presidents” adding, “she
breaks the mould as a woman from an African country where she fought to
reduce the country’s debt, gain greater access to international credit
markets and battle corruption.”
Advancing merit over politics, and given the current global economic
and social challenges, Okonjo-Iweala, is the best fit for the presidency
of the World Bank, the paper said, even as the influential newspaper
praised Obama’s choice as an “inspired choice.”
More importantly also, argues the paper, the tradition that allows
all presidents of the World Bank to be American, just as the headship of
the International Monetary Fund traditionally goes to Europeans is
antiquated and needs be replaced by a merit-centred consideration.
The New York Times noted, however, that what the bank needed was “a
president with experience beyond Washington’s narrow political and
economic circles.” It posited that although “Dr. Kim has worked on
development in the poorest countries, one major success: leading a World
Health Organization initiative that provided access to H.I.V. treatment
to millions of people, the new president must also tackle broader
issues of economics and growth, and manage the prickly political leaders
who are the bank’s overseers. That is why the bank board must take a
serious look at Dr. Kim’s strongest challenger, Okonjo-Iweala, Nigeria’s
finance minister.”
The paper argued that nevertheless, a merit-based consideration
should not exclude qualified Americans, the paper said, but even as
much, “neither should it guarantee them a job” in a world where emerging
economies contribute a significant share to global growth, and are
“rightly demanding a greater say in decision-making.”
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment